Sequential share bargaining
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper presents a new extension of the Rubinstein-St̊ahl bargaining model to the case with n players, called sequential share bargaining. The bargaining protocol is natural and has as its main feature that the players’ shares in the cake are determined sequentially. The bargaining protocol requires unanimous agreement for proposals to be implemented. Unlike all existing bargaining protocols with unanimous agreement, the resulting game has unique subgame perfect equilibrium utilities for any value of the discount factor. In equilibrium, agreement is reached immediately. The results are therefore qualitatively the same as in the two player case. The result builds on an analysis of so-called one-dimensional bargaining problems. We show that also one-dimensional bargaining problems have unique subgame perfect equilibrium utilities for any value of the discount factor, and that also in one-dimensional bargaining problems agreement is reached immediately.
منابع مشابه
An Exact Non-cooperative Support for the Sequential Raiffa Solution
This article provides an exact non-cooperative foundation of the sequential Raiffa solution for two person bargaining games. Based on an approximate foundation due to Myerson (1997) for any two-person bargaining game (S, d) an extensive form game G is defined that has an infinity of weakly subgame perfect equilibria whose payoff vectors coincide with that of the sequential Raiffa solution of (S...
متن کاملA Sequential Auction-Bargaining Procurement Model
One of the most important decisions that a firm faces in managing its supply chainis a procurement decision: selecting suitable suppliers among many potential compet-ing sellers and reducing the purchase cost. While both auction and bargaining havebeen extensively studied in the literature, the research that combines both auction andbargaining is limited. In this paper, we consi...
متن کاملNegotiation Agenda Strategies for Bargaining With Buying Teams
A theoretical framework for selecting negotiation agenda strategies is developed for the common situation in which a single sales person is faced with bargaining with multi-functional buying teams. Two key strategic decisions regarding agenda setting, namely, the use of simultaneous versus sequential negotiation agendas, and the order of importance in which multiple issues should be bargained i...
متن کاملEnvy can promote more equal division in alternating-offer bargaining
Bargainers in an open-ended alternating-offer bargaining situation may perceive envy, a utility loss caused by receiving the smaller share that is modeled in some social preferences in addition to self-interest. I extend Rubinstein (1982)’s original solution of the bargaining problem for two self-interested bargainers to this strategic situation. Bargainers still reach agreement in the first pe...
متن کاملReputational Bargaining with Minimal Knowledge of Rationality∗
Two players announce bargaining postures to which they may become committed and then bargain over the division of a surplus. The share of the surplus that a player can guarantee herself under first-order knowledge of rationality is determined (as a function of her probability of becoming committed), as is the bargaining posture that she must announce in order to guarantee herself this much. Thi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Int. J. Game Theory
دوره 41 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012